|
Post by Firefox on Nov 29, 2013 16:20:14 GMT
Take a look at this regulation order: northyorkshireovernightparking.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/tro-3.pdfBeing judged guilty in advance? Why should they be more likely to deposit waste between 11pm and 7am when sleeping? Does this look like a BS exercise to coerce people to use campsites by giving a spurious excuse? Is this actually a legal order?
|
|
|
Post by gaz on Nov 29, 2013 16:27:53 GMT
i think that could be applied but only if you agree...if not then no lol they are there again with the word person .....person or persons mean loads of things if they cant give you the meaning there is no order...in my book my freeman
|
|
|
Post by Firefox on Nov 29, 2013 16:31:33 GMT
I'm not agreeing with it, I think the reasons are false I'm not a lawyer, but can't see something like that standing up in court.
|
|
|
Post by edina on Nov 29, 2013 16:35:05 GMT
This runs out (no pun intended) in Jan 2014, are they extending the period? I've never been to Scarborough in the van and after all the bad press it's had, I don't really want to.
|
|
|
Post by gaz on Nov 29, 2013 16:42:24 GMT
edina dont worry you aint missing much......there are much better places to go
|
|
|
Post by Firefox on Nov 29, 2013 17:28:14 GMT
I only went years back. It was in a car though not in a motorhome (I slept in the car). Like gaz says, nothing special. Although I didn't have a porta potti in the car, no waste was deposited on the highways by me
|
|
|
Post by Firefox on Nov 29, 2013 18:29:47 GMT
kangooroo do you think this is legally enforceable, bearing in mind your experience with local authorities?
|
|
|
Post by francophile1947 on Nov 29, 2013 18:48:45 GMT
Item 1 is so badly written, without much punctuation, that it could read that we are only banned if we try to stop the occupants of motor caravans from dropping waste on the highway(rofl) - so just leave them to dump in peace and you can park safely I don't think that's what they meant though
|
|
|
Post by kangooroo on Nov 29, 2013 19:18:39 GMT
I can't judge whether it's legally enforceable but it sounds highly-ignorant to me.
|
|
|
Post by Etienne Le Croq on Nov 29, 2013 21:14:11 GMT
What a load of tosh!
|
|
|
Post by Firefox on Nov 29, 2013 21:48:53 GMT
I agree it is ignorantly worded. I don't know about waste on the highway... but that is waste verbal diarrhoea. I can just imagine the clueless campsite owner who I believe is on Scarborough council lobbying to protect his own interests ... not having the sense to realise those motorhomers wild camping would never visit his overpriced emporium anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Firefox on Nov 29, 2013 22:24:32 GMT
Good point!
Although it would be easy to plumb the waste pipe into an underslung that that could emptied back at home - I'm surprised the AA didn't do that.
|
|
|
Post by yorkieowl on Nov 30, 2013 23:45:38 GMT
Don't want to visit Scarborough and surrounds anyway, but this really got my back up, tarring us all with the same brush, they want to see the bloody local drunks on their way home if they're worried about waste being deposited on the highway, sent them a letter to this effect too, asking where they got their information from, bet I don't get a reply.
|
|